Skip to main content

Determinants of stillbirth among women who gave birth in public hospitalsĀ in Northwest Ethiopia, 2022

Abstract

Introduction

Stillbirth is still a major public health problem in middle- and low-income countries. However, there has been limited research conducted to identify determinants of stillbirth in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the determinants of stillbirth among women who gave birth in public hospitals in the West Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

An unmatched case–control study was conducted among 418 mothers who gave birth from March 1–30, 2022. Consecutive and systematic sampling techniques were used to select the cases and controls, respectively. The collected data were entered into Epidata and exported into SPSS version 16 for analysis. Numerical descriptive statistics were expressed by using the mean with standard deviation (SD) and/or median with interquartile range (IQR), whereas categorical variables were expressed by proportions. Bivariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify determinants of stillbirth. The model goodness of fit test was checked using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Variables having a P-value ≤ 0.25 in the bivariable analysis were entered into the multivariable analysis model. Adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to report the strength of association, and variables with a P-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 105 cases and 313 controls were included in this study. The odds of having stillbirth were higher among women who were illiterate (AOR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.34, 7.55), had first ANC visit in the second trimester (AOR: 11.4, 95% CI: 2.99, 43.71), had an induced mode of delivery (AOR: 8.7, 95% CI: 2.10, 36.03), history of stillbirth (AOR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.45, 4.90), bad obstetric history (AOR: 4.8, 95% CI: 1.44, 15.89), history of preterm (AOR: 7.6, 95% CI: 1.57, 37.21), not vaccinated for TT (AOR: 8.8, 95% CI: 2.23, 35.17), labor not followed by using partograph (AOR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.10, 8.42), and history of abortion (AOR: 11, 95% CI: 2.91, 41.31).

Conclusion

The determinants of stillbirth included women who were illiterate, started ANC visits in the second trimester, had an induced mode of delivery, history of stillbirth, bad obstetric history, history of preterm, history of abortion, not vaccinated for TT, and not followed by partograph. It is better to improve partograph utilization during intrapartum care and screen mothers who had a higher risk of adverse birth outcomes during their pregnancy to avert the problem.

Introduction

Stillbirth is defined as a baby born without any signs of life at or after 28 weeks of gestation [1]. Stillbirth is a major public health issue in both developing and industrialized countries around the world [2]. Worldwide, it is estimated to be 2.6 million third-trimester pregnancy losses, and more than 98% occurred in low- and middle-income countries [3].

According to the latest WHO report, the global stillbirth rate was 13.9 stillbirths per 1000 total births [4]. Moreover, although the rate of stillbirth varied significantly across African countries, the pooled rate of stillbirth in east Africa was 0.86% [5]. Several studies conducted in different regions of Ethiopia reported that the rate of stillbirth was 92 per 1000 births in Yirgalem Hospital [6], 6.8% in Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North Ethiopia [7], and 9.6% in Suhul Hospital Shire, Tigray, Ethiopia [8], and 85 per 1000 live births in the Amhara region [9].

Women who have stillbirth frequently express postpartum anxiety, depression, guilt, signs of grief, stigma, and loss of self-esteem [10, 11]. Women who repeatedly lose their neonates may be blamed, mistreated, and dishonored through a divorce, and an estimated 4.2 million women are living with depression [12].

According to studies conducted around the globe, early pregnancy, grand multiparity, poor maternal nutrition, maternal medical conditions, exposure to toxic substances, infection, prolonged labor, antepartum hemorrhage, preterm delivery, cord complications, and accidents are identified as risk factors for stillbirth [13,14,15]. However, in most low-income nations, the true cause of stillbirths is unknown [16].

Even though stillbirth is still a major public health issue in both developing and industrialized countries [2], there is an inconsistency of results among prior studies on the determinants of stillbirth among women in Ethiopian. As far as the researchers’ knowledge, there is no specific study conducted in the study area. Furthermore, the findings of this study will help the policy makers and program managers as well as local NGOs, zonal health department, and regional health bureau to develop new strategies to improve maternal and neonatal care services. In addition, it could also be used as a baseline for future studies. Therefore, the findings of this study aimed to identify determinants associated with stillbirth among women attending delivery in Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

Study area

This study was conducted in public hospitals in the West Gojjam Zone, Amhara region. The West Gojjam Zone is found in the Amhara region, 376 km from Addis Ababa and 185 km from Bahir Dar. West Gojjam Zone has seven public hospitals: Bure, Dega Damot, Merawi, Durbete, Adet, and Liben primary hospitals, and Finote Selam general hospital. In addition, there are 108 health centers and 441 health posts.

Study design and period

A multi-center institutional-based, unmatched case–control study was conducted from March 1–30, 2022.

Population

Source population

All mothers who gave birth at public hospitals in West Gojjam zone.

Study population

Cases

All mothers who gave stillbirth and were attended by a skilled birth attendant at selected public hospitals in West Gojjam zone during the study period.

Controls

All mothers who gave live birth and were attended by a skilled birth attendant at selected public hospitals in West Gojjam Zone during the study period.

Eligibility criteria

All mothers who were delivered by a skilled birth attendant at the selected public hospitals in West Gojjam zone were included in this study, whereas mothers with multiple births were excluded.

Sample size determination and sampling procedure

Sample size determination

The sample size for this study was calculated using the power approach of two population formulas using Epi Info software by considering the following assumptions.

$$\mathrm{Confidence}\;\mathrm{level}\;(\mathrm{CI})\;=\;95\%,\;\mathrm{margin}\;\mathrm{of}\;\mathrm{error}\;({\mathrm d}_2)\;=\;0.05,\;\mathrm{and}\;\mathrm{power}\;({\mathrm Z}_{\mathrm B})\;=\;80\%$$

r = ratio of controls to cases.

p = average proportion of exposure among cases and controls,

p1 = the proportion of exposure among cases,

p2 = the proportion of exposure among controls,

p1-p2, Minimum meaningful difference in proportions between case and control groups.

The values of p (average proportion of exposure among cases and controls), p1(the proportion of exposure among cases), and p2(the proportion of exposure among controlsā€ are given below (Annex 1).

The largest sample size was 380, and after adding a 10% non-response rate, the final sample size was 418. Finally, about 105 cases and 313 controls were included with the case-to-control ratio of 1:3.

Sampling procedure

Five public hospitals were randomly selected from the seven using a simple random sampling technique. From each hospital, all mothers who had encountered stillbirth were drawn consecutively as cases, and three controls per case were selected using a systematic random sampling technique until the required sample size had been reached. A total of 1105 term pregnant women had ANC follow-up in the selected hospitals. Hence, the sampling interval (k) was 3, which was calculated by dividing the total population by the sample size (1105/418). Then, to get the starting number, a lottery was used (Fig.Ā 1).

Fig.Ā 1
figure 1

A schematic representation of the sampling procedure for the study to assess the determinants of stillbirth among women who gave birth at public hospitals in West Gojjam zone, Amhara region, Ethiopia 2022

Operational definitions

Stillbirth

Is aĀ fetal death at or after 28Ā weeks of pregnancy, and results in a baby born without any signs of life.

Cases

Mothers who were given a stillbirth during labor.

Controls

Mothers who gave a live birth.

Bad obstetric history

Had previous unfavorable fetal outcome in terms of two or more consecutive spontaneous abortions, early neonatal deaths, stillbirths, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine fetal retardation, and congenital anomalies.

Data collection tools and techniques

The data collection tool was developed by reviewing related literature with consideration of socio-demographic, obstetric, and medical characteristics. A pre-tested structured face-to-face interviewer administrative questionnaire and checklist were used. Data collection was carried out by face-to-face interview and chart review.

Data quality control

The English version of the questionnaire was translated into Amharic, and finally back into English to check its consistency. A one-day training was given for data collectors and supervisors. The overall data collection process was closely monitored by the principal investigator and supervisors. The questionnaire was pretested using 5% of the total sample size outside the study area. If any ambiguity or incompleteness is discovered during supervision, it is attempted to be resolved before moving to the next step. During the data collection phase, the obtained data were reviewed for completeness, accuracy, clarity, and consistency before being entered into data entry forms daily.

Data management and analysis

Collected data were coded, cleaned, entered into Epi Data 3.1, and exported to SPSS version 25 for further statistical analysis. Numerical descriptive statistics were expressed by using mean with Standard Deviation (SD) and/or median with Interquartile Range (IQR), whereas categorical variables were expressed by proportions. Tables and graphs were used to present the descriptive statistics. The incomplete data that encountered were managed with the assumption of multiple imputations after ascertained that the missing data was completely at random. Both bivariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify the determinants of stillbirth. Variables having p ≤ 0.25 in the bivariable analysis were candidates for multivariable logistic regression analysis. Finally, variables having a P-value < 0.05 in the multivariable logistic regression analysis were declared to be statistically significant determinants of stillbirth. An Adjusted Odds Ratio (AHR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was used to report the strength of association. Multi-collinearity was checked using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) (mean VIF = 1.38), and the model goodness of fit test was checked using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. The backward elimination model was used to select the final model because it reduces the number of predictors, reducing multicollinearity problem and it is the best model to resolve overfitting.

Ethical considerations

The ethical approval was obtained from Ethical Review Committee of Debre Markos University, and informed verbal consent was obtained from each study participant. Data was kept anonymously by coding to keep confidentiality. Information about specific personal identifiers like the patient’s name were not collected, so it didn’t inflict any harm on the patients. All the processes of the research were performed and secured in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Results

Socio-demographic-related characteristics of the study participants

A total of 418 (105 cases and 313 controls) were interviewed with a case-to-control ratio of 1:3. The mean age of the case group was 34.28 years with SD of 5.7, while the mean age of the mother who participated in the control group was 32 with SD of 4.8 (TableĀ 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic-related characteristics of participants who attended delivery service in public hospitals at West Gojjam Zone, Amhara, Ethiopia, 2022 (N = 418)

Obstetrics-related characteristics of the study participants

All study participants had ANC visits in the previous pregnancy; of those, 20.8% had ≄ 4 visits. Among the total of 418, 42.1% attended their first ANC in the second trimester. The majority (76.8%) of the study participants’ labor was followed by using a partograph (TableĀ 2).

Table 2 Obstetrics-related characteristics of participants who attended delivery service in public hospitals at West Gojjam Zone, Amhara, Ethiopia, 2022 (N = 418)

Medical-related characteristics of the study participants

From the total of 105 cases, 7.6% were anemic, 8.6% had urinary tract infections, 11.4% were hypertensive, and 18.2% had other health complications. Also, of 313 control subjects, 5.1% were anemic, 7.3% had a problem of urinary tract infections, 10.9% were hypertensive, and 8.3% had other health complications (TableĀ 3).

Table 3 Medical-related characteristics of women who attended delivery service in public hospitals at West Gojjam Zone, Amhara, Ethiopia, 2022 (N = 418)

Determinants of stillbirth

In the bi-variable analysis, maternal age, gestational age during pregnancy, mal-presentation, antenatal care, number of births, history of abortion, history of stillbirth, history of PPH, hemorrhage during current pregnancy, UTI, HTN, bad obstetric history, TT vaccination, mode of delivery, partograph utilization, use of contraceptives, educational status, residence, and history of preterm were eligible for multivariable analysis (P-value < 0.25).

In multivariable logistic regression analysis, being illiterate (AOR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.34, 7.55), gestational age at the first ANC (AOR: 11.4, 95% CI: 2.99, 43.71), induction of labor (AOR: 8.7, 95% CI: 2.10, 36.03), history of stillbirth (AOR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.45, 4.9), having a bad obstetric history (AOR: 4.8, 95% CI: 1.44, 15.89), having hemorrhage during current pregnancy (AOR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.46, 6.81), having a history of preterm (AOR: 7.6, 95% CI: 1.57, 37.21), not taking TT vaccination (AOR: 8.8, 95% CI: 2.23, 35.17), not followed by partograph (AOR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.10, 8.42), and history of abortion (AOR: 11.0, 95% CI: 2.91, 41.31) were found to be determinants of stillbirth (TableĀ 4).

Table 4 Bi-variable and multi-variable Analysis among women who give birth at public hospitals in West Gojjam Zone, Amhara, Ethiopia, 2022 (N = 418)

Discussion

Stillbirth is a major but neglected public health problem in resource-limited countries, specifically in Ethiopia. The current study aimed to assess the determinants of stillbirth among women who gave birth in the West Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.

This study found that being illiterate was a 1.6 times higher risk for stillbirth (AOR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.34, 7.55) compared with being literate. This finding was supported by the previous studies conducted in Yemen [17], Nigeria [18], Ethiopia [19], Ethiopia [4, 9]. The possible explanation could be that illiteracy might compromise access to healthcare, including birth spacing and financial status.

The findings of the current study also showed that mothers who started their ANC visit during the second trimester were 11.4 times at risk for stillbirth as compared with mothers who started their ANC visit during the first trimester. This finding was supported by previous studies conducted in England [20], Sweden [21], Nigeria [18], Bale Zone, Ethiopia [12], and another studies conducted in Ethiopia [19, 22]. The possible reason might be due to that they have started their ANC follow-up after having serious medical and obstetric complications, which is somewhat challenging, and this affects the target of most treatment modalities and healthcare management systems. This implies that early ANC follow-up helps a mother to be screened for certain risk factors and used to take appropriate measures [19]. But, it was inconsistent with the findings of previous studies conducted in Yemen [17], Nepal [23], Mexico [24], and Bahir Dar, Ethiopia [4].

The odds of having a stillbirth were 8.7-fold higher among mothers who induced their labor as compared to their counterparts. This finding was in line with the previous studies done in United States [25, 26], Romania [3], United Kingdom [27], Nigeria [28]. The possible reason could be that during induction of labor, there might be an exposure to an artificial uterotonic agent, and this may result in uterine over stimulation, which causes a non-reassuring fetal heart rate and may end up with stillbirth [29]. But, it was not supported by the studies conducted in Zambia [30] and Southern Ethiopia [22], which revealed that cesarean mode of delivery increased the risk of stillbirth.

The current study revealed that mothers who had a bad obstetric history were 4.8 times at higher risk of stillbirth as compared to their counterparts. This finding was supported by the studies conducted in Nepal [31], India [29], Jamaica [32], and Ethiopia [19]. The possible explanation could be due to delay in visiting health facilities, the referral system, as well as failure to diagnose and poor emergency preparedness, which results in the rapture of the uterus and can increase the risk of stillbirth.

Preterm labor was one of the determinants of stillbirth in this study; mothers who encountered a preterm labor had 7.6 odds of stillbirth as compared to mothers who had no history of preterm labor. This finding was in line with the studies done in Nigeria [28] and Jimma, Ethiopia [33]. The possible reason might be due to the fact that premature birth had immature lungs, they are at risk of developing asphyxia and becoming distressed, having heart problems, having underdeveloped immune systems, and developing an infection. This in turn causes stillbirth. Therefore, mothers who were diagnosed with preterm labor should be followed strictly to prevent the risk of stillbirths.

History of abortion was 11-fold risk of stillbirth compared with their counterparts. This finding was also in agreement with the findings of different previous studies conducted in the United States [16], Sweden [34], Nepal [23], Jimma, Ethiopia [33], Bahir Dar, Ethiopia [35], and Adigrat, Ethiopia [19]. The possible reason might be related to the maternal Rh-factor, which leads to erythroblastosis fetalis and maternal chronic and repeated pregnancy-related comorbidities that result in pregnancy loss.

The current study also showed that pregnant mothers who had not taken the TT vaccine had 8.8-fold higher risk of stillbirth than their counterparts. This finding was supported by the studies done in Switzerland [36], Iran [37], and Bahir Dar, Ethiopia [4]. The possible explanation might be that if the mother has not taken the TT vaccine, during or before conception, the fetus becomes susceptible to tetanus in the womb, and this might increase the chance of the fetus having a birth defect, miscarriage, or stillbirth.

The current finding also found that the odds of stillbirth were 3.1 times higher among mothers whose labor was not followed by using a partograph than labor followed by a partograph. This finding was in agreement with the findings of previous studies conducted in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia [4] and Aksum, Ethiopia [19]. The possible reason could be that not utilizing partograph, obstructed labor, and prolonged labour, which lead to severe fetal compromise during the intrapartum period, are difficult to diagnose and may end up in stillbirth. Hence, utilization of partograph during labor is highly recommended to reduce the risk of stillbirths.

According to this study, mothers who had hemorrhage during their current pregnancy had a 1.9 times higher risk of stillbirth compared with mothers who had no history of hemorrhage. This finding was supported by a study conducted in Nepal [23]. It might be due to hemorrhage during pregnancy, decreased blood flow to the placenta, which results in decreased oxygen and nutritional supply to the fetus, and this can end up in stillbirth.

Mothers who had a history of the previous stillbirths were 1.5 times at risk for stillbirth than mothers who had no history of stillbirth. The finding was supported by the findings of studies conducted in Nepal [23], Mexico [24], Zambia [30], Nigeria [28], and Ethiopia [12, 22]. The possible reason might be that the mother has undiagnosed chromosomal abnormalities that cause intrauterine fetal death.

Although multiple risk factors of stillbirth could be examined using an appropriate study design, this study has several limitations. The facility-based study might have had an overrepresentation of the determinants of stillbirth because more complicated cases are referred to health facilities. Moreover, it is an unmatched case–control study which lacks representativeness as compared to matched case–control studies.

Conclusion

This study concludes that independent variables such as being unable to read and write, having a delayed ANC visit, induction of labor, preterm labor, having a history of stillbirth, having bad obstetric history, having a history of hemorrhage during pregnancy, not using a pratograph during labor, didn’t take the TT vaccine, and having a history of abortion were found to be determinants of stillbirth. Therefore, it is better to improve partograph utilization during intrapartum care and screen mothers who had a higher risk of adverse birth outcomes during their pregnancy, such as those who had a bad obstetric history, history of preterm labor, history of stillbirth, and a history of hemorrhage during pregnancy. Women shall have regular ANC follow-ups during their pregnancy period and attend skilled delivery care at health institutions. In addition, future studies using a stronger study design are warranted to overcome the limitations of this study.

Data availability

Data will be available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Organization WH. World health statistics 2015: World Health Organization; 2015.

  2. Heazell AE, Siassakos D, Blencowe H, Burden C, Bhutta ZA, Cacciatore J, et al. Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):604–16.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Buinoiu NF, Stoica SI, Corina M, Panaitescu A, Peltecu G, Nicolae G. Mode of delivery in stillbirth. Maedica. 2017;12(2):101.

    PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Worede DT, Dagnew GW. Determinants of stillbirth in Felege-Hiwot comprehensive specialized referral hospital, North-west, Ethiopia, 2019. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):1–6.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Tesema GA, Tessema ZT, Tamirat KS, Teshale AB. Prevalence of stillbirth and its associated factors in East Africa: generalized linear mixed modeling. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–10.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Mengesha S, Dangisso MH. Burden of stillbirths and associated factors in Yirgalem Hospital, Southern Ethiopia: a facility based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–8.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Goba GK, Legesse AY, Whelan A, Divelbess K, Cavanaug E, Mohammednur SA, et al. Prevalence Of Stillbirth In Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North Ethiopia: A Descriptive Retrospective Study. Ethiop J Reprod Health. 2019;11(3):7-.

  8. Adhena T, Haftu A, Gebreegziabher B. Assessment of magnitude and associated factors of adverse birth outcomes among deliveries at Suhul hospital Shire, Tigray, Ethiopia from September, 2015 to February, 2016. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2017;1(7):2045–52.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Lakew D, Tesfaye D, Mekonnen H. Determinants of stillbirth among women deliveries at Amhara region. Ethiopia BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–7.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Arocha P-R, Range LM. Events surrounding stillbirth and their effect on symptoms of depression among mothers. Death Stud. 2021;45(7):573–7.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Burden C, Bradley S, Storey C, Ellis A, Heazell AE, Downe S, et al. From grief, guilt pain and stigma to hope and pride–a systematic review and meta-analysis of mixed-method research of the psychosocial impact of stillbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):1–12.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Dagne HM, Melku AT, Abdi AA. Determinants of stillbirth among deliveries attended in Bale Zone Hospitals, Oromia Regional State, Southeast Ethiopia: a case–control study. Int J Women’s Health. 2021;13:51.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. FrĆøen JF, Gordijn SJ, Abdel-Aleem H, BergsjĆø P, Betran A, Duke CW, et al. Making stillbirths count, making numbers talk-issues in data collection for stillbirths. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9(1):1–17.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Di Mario S, Say L, Lincetto O. Risk factors for stillbirth in developing countries: a systematic review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis. 2007:S11-S21.

  15. Engmann C, Garces A, Jehan I, Ditekemena J, Phiri M, Mazariegos M, et al. Causes of community stillbirths and early neonatal deaths in low-income countries using verbal autopsy: an International, Multicenter Study. J Perinatol. 2012;32(8):585–92.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Reinebrant HE, Leisher SH, Coory M, Henry S, Wojcieszek AM, Gardener G, et al. Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;125(2):212–24.

  17. Obadi M, Taher R, Qayad M, Khader Y. Risk factors of stillbirth in Yemen. J Neonatal-Perinatal Med. 2018;11(2):131–6.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Omo-Aghoja LO, Onohwakpor E, Adeyinka A, Omene J. Incidence and determinants of stillbirth amongst parturients in two hospitals in Southern Nigeria. J Basic Clin Reprod Sci. 2014;3(1):15–21.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Berhie KA, Gebresilassie HG. Logistic regression analysis on the determinants of stillbirth in Ethiopia. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2016;2(1):1–10.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. Bmj. 2013;346.

  21. Raymond EG, Cnattingius S, Kiely JL. Effects of maternal age, parity, and smoking on the risk of stillbirth. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(4):301–6.

  22. Abebe H, Shitu S, Workye H, Mose A. Predictors of stillbirth among women who had given birth in Southern Ethiopia, 2020: A case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(5): e0249865.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Kc A, Nelin V, Wrammert J, Ewald U, Vitrakoti R, Baral GN, et al. Risk factors for antepartum stillbirth: a case-control study in Nepal. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1–10.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Romero-GutiĆ©rrez G, MartĆ­nez-Ceja CA, Abrego-Olvira E, León ALP-Pd. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for stillbirth in Leon, Mexico. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2005;84(1):2–6.

  25. Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Kontopoulos E, Smulian JC. Mode of delivery and risk of stillbirth and infant mortality in triplet gestations: United States, 1995 through 1998. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):464–9.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Boyle A, Preslar JP, Hogue CJ, Silver RM, Reddy UM, Goldenberg RL, et al. Route of delivery in women with stillbirth: results from the stillbirth collaborative research network. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(4):693.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Smith GC, Shah I, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery‐related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2005;112(8):1139–44.

  28. Okonofua FE, Ntoimo LFC, Ogu R, Galadanci H, Mohammed G, Adetoye D, et al. Prevalence and determinants of stillbirth in Nigerian referral hospitals: a multicentre study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–9.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Singh G, Chouhan R, Sidhu K. Maternal factors for low birth weight babies. Med J Armed Forces India. 2009;65(1):10–2.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  30. Stringer EM, Vwalika B, Killam WP, Giganti MJ, Mbewe R, Chi BH, et al. Determinants of stillbirth in Zambia. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(5):1151–9.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Kumari N, Morris N, Dutta R. Is screening of TORCH worthwhile in women with bad obstetric history: an observation from eastern Nepal. J Health Popul Nutr. 2011;29(1):77.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Greenwood R, Samms-Vaughan M, Golding J, Ashley D. Past obstetric history and risk of perinatal death in Jamaica. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1994;8:40–53.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Tilahun D, Assefa T. Incidence and determinants of stillbirth among women who gave birth in Jimma University specialized hospital, Ethiopia. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;28(1).

  34. EkĆ©us C, Cnattingius S, EssĆ©n B, Hjern A. Stillbirth among foreign-born women in Sweden. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21(6):788–92.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  35. Mulatu T, Debella A, Feto T, Dessie Y. Determinants of stillbirth among women who gave birth at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Eastern Ethiopia: A facility-based cross-sectional study. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10:20503121221076370.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  36. Giles M, Mason E, MuƱoz F, Moran A, Lambach P, Merten S, et al. Antenatal care service delivery and factors affecting effective tetanus vaccine coverage in low-and middle-income countries: Results of the Maternal Immunisation and Antenatal Care Situational analysis (MIACSA) project. Vaccine. 2020;38(33):5278–85.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  37. Pasha H, Faramarzi M, Bakhtiari A, Hajian K. Stillbirth and some related factors, Babol, 1998. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2000;2(5):17–21.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our deep gratitude goes to Debre Markos University and also we would like to say thank you to those who were working in the card room and chief clinical officers in public hospitals in the West Gojjam zone. Finally, thanks to the supervisors and data collectors.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding in any form.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AG: conceptualization, formal analysis, interpretation of the data, and original drafting of the paper; MA, MA, TY, GK, RB and MA editing and revising critically for important intellectual content, and manuscript preparation. Finally, all authors read and approved the final version of the submitted article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengistu Abebe Messelu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Ethical Review Committee of Debre Markos University, college of medicine and healthĀ sciences. A permission letter was obtained from selected hospitals in West Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. VerbalĀ informed consent was also obtained from each mother. Confidentiality of the information was assured and theĀ privacy of the respondent was carefully maintained. Information about specific personal identifiers like the patient’sĀ name were not collected, so it didn’t inflict any harm on the patients. All the processes of the research wereĀ performed and secured in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

40748_2024_199_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary Material 1:Ā Anex 1 Sample Size determination to assess determinants of stillbirth among women who gave birth at public hospitals of West Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Melaku, A.G., Messelu, M.A., Alemayehu, M. et al. Determinants of stillbirth among women who gave birth in public hospitalsĀ in Northwest Ethiopia, 2022. matern health, neonatol and perinatol 11, 7 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40748-024-00199-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40748-024-00199-z

Keywords